|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
24.02.02 GROUP OF INDEPENDENT TRADE UNIONS AND NGOS MEDIA RELEASE WORKERS’ BEING PUT ON THE BREADLINE The Group of Independent Trade Unions and NGOS is extremely disturbed about the position that now seems to becoming the norm, for employers to put workers on the breadline simply in order to increase profit levels. In the last few weeks there has been a spate of retrenchments and/or the threat of retrenchment. If the employers get their way several hundred workers will be out of employment. We refer to the following:
The Group of Independent Trade Unions and NGOS expresses its solidarity with all the affected workers in their struggle to save their livelihood. We will be holding a Joint COSSABO on Wednesday March 13th at 1.30 pm at the OWTU’s Paramount Building to deal with all the various issues affecting working people and to map out a major campaign to struggle for jobs for the unemployed, quality jobs and job security for the employed. This has particular importance in light of the public concern about increased crime. It is well known that unemployment and poverty are major contributing factors to high crime rates, and therefore it is hypocritical for employer organizations to call for tough action on crime when their members, by callously putting workers on the breadline and/or super exploiting their workers, are in fact exacerbating the social conditions that give rise to increased levels of crime. We therefore call on employers to desist from the strategy of maximizing profits through the retrenchment of workers. David Abdulah Chief Education and Research Officer, Oilfields Workers’ Trade Union For the Group of Independent Trade Unions and NGOS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
21.02.02 GROUP OF INDEPENDENT TRADE UNIONS AND NGOS MEDIA STATEMENT POWER SHARING NOT JUST FOR "GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION" The ongoing talks between Mr. Manning and Mr. Panday have to date resolved nothing with respect to the convening of Parliament. As everyone knows the 18-18 result of the December 2001 General Election has meant that unless there is agreement between the PNM and UNC on the person to be nominated as Speaker of the House of Representatives there can be no functioning Parliament. Some persons have placed great store in the issue of convening of Parliament as, in their view, Parliament is central to the democratic process in our system of governance. We, the Group of Independent Trade Unions and NGOS, both agree and disagree. We agree that the elected government (the Executive) must be held accountable for their actions and that it is to parliament that the executive accounts. We also agree that, in our system, members of the government, being Members of Parliament, should also function as a committee of parliament, that is, they cannot and should not exist outside of the existence of a functioning and active parliament. The present situation whereby there is an Executive without a functioning Parliament to which it should be reporting, and from which it springs, is therefore highly undesirable – regardless of its constitutionality. Indeed, for the situation to continue would be to establish an exceptionally dangerous precedent of rule by executive fiat – one element of a dictatorship. At the same time, however, we cannot agree with the UNC position that the PNM government is seeking to establish a dictatorship since the present deadlock with respect to the convening of Parliament is not of Mr. Manning’s making. The Crowne Plaza "Ten point agreement", despite its major and glaring deficiencies, did specify that the parties would jointly agree on a Speaker and that this would be done before the President was asked to appoint the Prime Minister. This was done, but the UNC reneged on the agreement, thus preventing the convening of Parliament. Any rule by executive fiat is then very much also of the UNC’s doing. More fundamental, however, is our challenge to the conventional view that our political system provides for democratic governance. While we have certain important democratic rights and freedoms enshrined in the Constitution, there can be no doubting that the system entrenches power in the hands of a few. This is why the winning of political office is so crucial to the leaders of the traditional parties. Office also enables the dispensing of patronage and provides opportunity for corruption. The so called "winner takes all" system results in the exclusion from decision making of all but the Prime Minister’s inner circle of politicians and advisors, together with the major political investors and the principal owners and managers of capital. Even elected MP’s who have Ministerial portfolios are excluded from the real decision making meetings, with the Cabinet operating as a sham. The status of the Parliament is even worse, as once a government has a majority it essentially rules by executive fiat. Except on bills brought to the Parliament that require a special majority, the government can do as it wants, regardless of the views of the Opposition or of the rest of the national community, for that matter. Further, given that members of each "bench" essentially toe the line established by the party (in reality of the political leader) what we have in effect is a system of "Prime Ministerial dictatorship". The convening of Parliament in our system, therefore, is no guarantor of democratic governance. In this context, "power sharing" between the parliamentary parties as is currently being negotiated between Messrs. Manning and Panday is never going to get off the ground, since the person now holding office will not wish to relinquish the power of that office, while the person who is seeking to get a share of that power is doing so, not out of any interest in the people, but rather to perpetuate the status quo. The only way forward is to create a new political culture where power sharing means that both the Parliamentary parties share power with the people. 18-18 has presented us with a tremendous opportunity to begin to develop this culture in a practical manner. The Group of Independent Trade Unions and NGOS recognized this opportunity in the immediate aftermath of December 10th and sought to persuade the leaders of the parties of our position, which position was made public on December 16th, 2001. Specifically, we proposed that there be power sharing between the parties at the Executive level, while power sharing with civil society takes place at the level of the Senate and the Boards of state enterprises and statutory bodies. In addition, we proposed that there be a review of all major government policies with civil society being centrally involved. Such a policy review would help to ensure that we have "national polices" and not "PNM" or "UNC" policies, while the appointing of persons nominated by civil society to state boards would depoliticise these organizations. We are all well aware of the damage that has been done as a result of the politicization of such bodies. The appointment, by the parties, of civil society nominees to the Senate with a free vote would have begun a culture of making the Executive truly accountable to the Parliament. We again urge the leaders of the PNM and UNC to adopt our proposals since it is patently clear that, in the absence of such an approach, their negotiations will only deteriorate further, with possibly very negative results for the country. In addition, we call on the PNM government to very speedily initiate the promised Commissions of Enquiry into various projects where major allegations of corruption have been made. The delay is definitely not good for Trinidad and Tobago. David Abdulah Chief Education and Research Officer, Oilfields Workers’ Trade Union For Group of Independent Trade Unions and NGOs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02.01.02
PG’s Message for 2002 I wish it like everybody else but indications are that the New Year is unlikely to be happy or prosperous. 2002 from all indicators, promises to be a tough and demanding year for all of us in the OWTU and workers and their Unions generally. Our own political and, as some have identified, constitutional crisis here will pose serious challenges which will themselves impact our socio-economic well being. And as has been the workers’ experience – if we do not organise, unite and fight a disciplined battle – it is big business, the owners of capital and their political party leaders who will broker a settlement that will benefit the interest only of the haves and to disadvantage of the have-nots. We must be clear therefore as to where, as workers we must stand. A brief reflection on the past thirteen (13) months would reveal the tremendous amount of work which we did – negotiating improved terms and conditions of employment, wage and salary packages, retirement and pension benefits and wellness and medical plan provisions for thousands of our members and the many thousands of their families. It was indeed very good work done in an environment perhaps slightly less hostile than 2002 portends. But we nevertheless succeeded without serious industrial action. We successfully completed negotiations on the first OWTU/Powergen Collective Agreement (in its own right) since the divestment of T & TEC’s Generated Facilities in 1995. For the first time in fifteen years, we settled a new collective agreement with T & TEC with a positive pay increase in the first year of the agreement. We are at this time awaiting T & TEC’s call to begin discussions on improvements to the EHOP and Pension Plans. Petrotrin’s Monthly Salaried workers had their terms and conditions and salaries improved and are expecting other adjustments on the conclusion of some residual matters. Some of those residual matters are common and others consequential to Hourly Rated, Weekly Paid and Junior Staff workers. We successfully improved terms and conditions at the TCL Group – Ready Mix, TPL and TCL – with the latter paying the highest productivity bonus and real wage increase ever and with the Ready Mix workers receiving the sector’s best COLA formula of 13c for every one (1) point rise in the IRP. Workers at Flavorite, CPI, AGOS, Classic Caterers, Tye Manufacturing, Colgate Palmolive, TECU, Trinidad Aggregate Products, and National Canners were not to be forgotten. They all had their wage Agreements settled at bilateral negotiations led by very committed Executive and Labour Relations Officers of our proud OWTU. We wages tremendous struggle to improve the conditions and compensation for those offshore workers who make life in our oil and gas economy real for the people of Trinidad and Tobago. We succeeded in moving those workers’ offshore bonus from a paltry $300 per hitch to a sum of $1600 (according to the employers’ interpretation) or $2400 (by the interpretation of the Union). At Lever Brothers we again made significant improvements to terms and conditions of employment and the remuneration package without third party intervention. We have done well. The Hydro-Agri workers too have realized significant improvements with the Settlement of negotiations for the Bargaining Units there. And at TRINMAR where we only recently received formal Recognition for the Monthly Paid, a most successful round of negotiations were concluded with pay increases to the tune of 11.5% effective February 2000 and a settlement bonus of $7,500 per worker. I am tempted to boast that it is only the OWTU prepared and knowledgeably led will achieve these feats. And there are many more which for the brevity of this message cannot be detailed now. But it had not all been smooth sailing. We did all these and more in hostile Human and Industrial Relations circumstances. We experienced the worse displays of management arrogance and backward industrial relations practices and discrimination at the hands of a politically influenced Board and Management at the Trinidad and Tobago Electricity Commission. Malfeasance, mismanagement and political patronage and industrial disorder seemed to have been the preoccupation at Petrotrin and NP. At these two important State Enterprises it was a case of the Party first, second, third and last. The important business of the enterprises and the Human and Industrial Relations functions were always an after thought low down on the list. That is why Petrotrin and NP performed badly. The new political arrangement seems headed in a similar direction thus continuing the decay in the body politic. Retrenchment and VSSP have been the most devastating blows to our industries and our membership strength. Contract Labour is expensive due mainly to corruption, duplicity and its quite often substandard results. And contract labourers being the transient workers that they are, are difficult to organise. In the midst of all these there continued to be the subversion of the Union and attempts at sabotage of its functioning by termites within. We are determined though, that we will survive and succeed. Much was done and much was achieved. There is more to be done and brought over to this new year. In addition our 2002 Programme is being rolled out. All of our work – Operations Improvement; Education; Social and Political Development; Organisational Resource Development; Business and Enterprise Development – all of them will call for your support and involvement. They will contribute to the OWTU continuing to be second to none among Trade Unions and People’s Organisations regionally. And I continue to recommend that tomorrow; you should not leave home without OWTU membership. Let us work together to meet and overcome the challenges of the time and contribute to a productive and rewarding 2002. back to top |